Showing posts with label nanotech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nanotech. Show all posts

October 25, 2007

An organizational problem

A clever little experiment appeared in this week's JACS preprints, from an Italian group at the University of Bologna. Their efforts concern fluorescent nanoparticles, specifically ones in which the fluorophores have been encapsulated in a silica substance. The advantage of this sort of construct is twofold: it concentrates a large number of fluorescent molecules in the same spot, and also it sequesters them from ions in the solution that might quench their fluorescence. The latter effect could be maximized if you synthesized a nanoparticle that had a fluorophore-doped center and a fluorophore-free shell. Rampazzo et al. have accomplished just this, and demonstrated that the system can be tuned to produce some interesting effects.

Using a pyrene derivative that was only weakly fluorescent in oxygenated water, Rampazzo et al. constructed a reaction to create a doped nanoparticle. In an initial case, they added the dye to about 0.1%, and then grew nanoparticles up to a size of about 90 nanometers. The dye was almost completely incorporated into the particles, and the quantum yield correspondingly increased in an almost linear fashion. Similarly, the results of light-scattering experiments indicated that the particles were growing with a rate equal to that of the increase in quantum yield. The interesting feature here is that although these rates are equal, the fluorescence plateaus significantly before the apparent particle radius reaches its maximum. This result indicates that the fluorescent dye is incorporated relatively early but that the particle continues to grow after this supply is exhausted, thus creating precisely the kind of shell we wanted (A, B, C below):


This success seems to be based entirely on a fortuitous choice of dye concentration. What if that concentration is changed? Rampazzo et al. changed the concentration by an order of magnitude and produced another interesting effect. It turns out that when there are a number of these dye molecules close to one another, they form excimers with an emission maximum at a wavelength of light ~100 nm longer than the monomer. When the dye constitutes 1% of the reaction mixture, there is an initial decrease in emission from the monomer that occurs with roughly the same rate as an increase in excimer emission and in particle radius. Later the monomer emissions recover, and all three processes plateau at approximately the same time. This suggests the formation of a heterogeneous particle as shown in D, E, F above.

This time the dye is not sequestered entirely from the solution, but local concentration at the core of the particle is so high that an unusual fluorescent property is observed. It's a conceptually simple little experiment, but it has an interesting result, and one that will have to be considered in future efforts to construct nanoparticles of this kind.

At the same time, if extreme local concentrations of some molecule have fortuitous or useful properties, this potential problem for nanoparticle construction might become an advantage. Consider if you have some molecule of interest that forms an excimer or exciplex with a known dye. Taking a sample containing traces of this molecule, one could use the encapsulation technique to construct a highly sensitive fluorescent detector.


Read the rest...

August 29, 2007

Automation for your nanodevice assembly

An interesting article appeared in JACS ASAP today from C.S. Hartley and J.S. Moore at UIUC on a clever way to direct the assembly of an asymmetric macrocycle. The approach relies on a simple idea to address a fundamental question about nanostructures, namely, how to make sure they assemble themselves as we would like. Given that protein design still isn't quite far enough along to create any product we desire, we have to rely on more conventional chemistry. The basics of the approach should be obvious from the image on the right (shamelessly stolen from the paper). Note the reactive groups on the lower side of these compounds; even without knowing the relevant chemistry it should be clear what mechanism for directed assembly is implied. Given that the smallest geometrically stable assembly consists of three units, and that entropy favors the creation of small assemblies and enthalpy dislikes dangling functional groups, it should be obvious that dumping all these into a reactive pot should mostly produce units that have a composition of 1-1-1 or 1-2-3.

This is in fact what the authors observe when they perform the experiment, though they find (perhaps surprisingly) that in mixtures of all three components the 1-2-3 macrocycle predominates. Glancing at the product it's clear that the macrocycles themselves will assemble into stacked arrays given the right conditions. If covalent chemistry is used to control this assembly, one has a rather simple method that could be used to construct fairly complex structures. Also, the yields from these reactions were encouragingly rich in the desired molecules, suggesting that only a little further optimization is necessary to produce effective scale-up.

Nothing in the paper is particularly earth-shattering, but then again, the cleverest answers often seem blazingly simple in hindsight. Hartley and Brown have come up with just such an answer here, in a commendably clear and readable paper.

Read the rest...

August 15, 2007

Small-molecule allosteric catalyst

An interesting pair of articles showed up this week, both from Chad Mirkin's lab at the Nanotechnology Center of Northwestern University. You can find them both in the August 22 edition of JACS. The essence of these articles is that Mirkin's group has created a group of macrocyclic catalysts that can be allosterically regulated by small ligands. The basic principle is shown below (figure taken from the second paper):

The catalytic molecule has a small intrinsic ability to catalyze the chemical conversion of the small molecules, as shown on the left. The addition of the "Analytes" in this case Cl- and CO, displaces the sulfur coordinating groups that are weakly bound to the rhodium or copper metal centers. Removing the sulfur coordination allows the molecule to undergo a conformational change, opening up to adopt a new structure that is vastly more effective as a catalyst. This mimics the allosteric regulation of protein catalysts and binding proteins by ligands.

The approach is a pretty clever bit of molecular engineering, and an important step forward for nanotechnology. Though it remains to be seen how well these molecules survive under field conditions (reducing/oxidizing environments, complex solutions), they have a feature that will be absolutely essential for functional nanomachines, namely that they can be regulated. The ability to turn our microscopic tools on and off will be an important part of producing useful nanomachines, to say nothing of avoiding the "gray goo" of sci-fi nightmares.

If you're interested, check out these articles:
Kuwabara, J. Stern, C.L., and Mirkin, C.A. "A Coordination Chemistry Approach to a Multieffector Enzyme Mimic", J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) p. 10074-10075.

Masar III, M.S., Gianneschi, N.C., Oliveri, C.G., Stern, C.L., Nguyen, S.T., and Mirkin, C.A. "Allosterically Regulated Supramolecular Catalysis of Acyl Transfer Reactions for Signal Amplification and Detection of Small Molecules" J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) p. 10149-10158.

I recommend the first article for lay readers, and the second for the hardcore.

Read the rest...